WORLD
How The FBI Helps Ukrainian Intelligence Hunt ‘Disinformation’ On Social Media
Number of Jailed Journalists at Record High
Uighur refugee dies after nine years in detention in Thailand
Who is Gal Luft? Missing Israeli professor wanted by US for weapons trafficking
THE CARTER CENTER: Creating Disease While Hording MONEY
HEMISPHERE
Tamara Lich on organizing the Freedom Convoy, which province showed the most support YT
What Is “Polvo Rosa”, The New Highly Addictive Drug Sold in Mexico?
Colombia’s Coca Market Crash Unlikely to Impact Cocaine Trade
HEALTH
The COVID vaccine causes tinnitus and many other adverse events: there is no doubt about this
Save on computers & electronics
NATION
ABC News censors RFK Jr. interview remarks on Covid vax problems, may have violated federal law
North Carolina Supreme Court Reinstates Voter ID Law Upsetting Democrats Intent On Using Voter Theft
Justice Alito Told WSJ the Goal of the Dobbs’ Protests Was Assassination
All Empires Are Mortal, the “American Empire” too
Degas Museum Vandalism Shares Funding Platform w/DNC and Antifa
California Doctor Faces $290 Million In COVID-19-Related Fraud Charges
The Crime of “Talking to Tucker Carlson”
You Won’t Believe How Much Taxpayers Are Forced to Pay for Illegal Alien Healthcare in Illinois. Editor’s note; Over $1B so far this year
6. I claimed the vaccines cause strokes. The CDC says no, false alarm. So why isn’t anyone taking my $1M bet on this? Doesn’t anyone believe the CDC?
7. If pilots aren’t failing EKGs, why did they change the standards? Even the FAA couldn’t answer that one. Do you know?
8. Why weren’t we warned that more boosters —> worse results? In December 2022, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic reported that they had found “the higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19.” Why shouldn’t we be concerned? What about biologic plausibility? Is there any mechanism of action which will explain why the likelihood of infection goes up but the risk of hospitalization and death go down? We aren’t aware of any. Are you?
MACRO
China’s CBDC takes a more important place on WeChat’s platform
Fed governor outlines CBDC risks
Why Gold Is Such an Effective Weapon Against the Government’s Monetary Schemes
MICRO
Disney cuts bite as animation & unscripted veterans exit
Stellantis, GM, Mazda and Ford dealerships sell across 4 states
Like, 10-4, man: Meet the Teamsters unionizing the cannabis industry YT
WORTH ANOTHER LOOK
Seth Keshel – Behind The Election Integrity Curtain – July 29, 2021 Rumble
PARAHERESY
UFO crash hits wind turbine. Aliens Hate Windmills Too YT
CULTURE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
HOW BERNIE SANDERS FELL FOR THIS SOVIET TRICK (PT. 3) Bitchute
MONDO
Decaying San Gorgonio Pass Wind Farm in California 2021 YT
Three Endorsed (But, However, Caveats, etc.) Books By Michelle Malkin, David Limbaugh, And Aaron Klein (MLK)
As you might know, I am not wild about standard book reviews.
Here is a collective thumbs up for three books about Barack Obama followed by musings about what, if any, impact these books might have had.
The Manchurian President: Barack Obama’s Ties to Communists, Socialists, and Other Anti-American Extremists Hardcover – May 3, 2010
by Aaron Klein (Author), Brenda J. Elliott (Author) [Dig the cut and paste proficiency]
The authors make the valid point that Barack Obama had numerous ties to Anti-American Americans. Chilling.
Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies Paperback – August 9, 2010
by Michelle Malkin (Author)
The author shows us that Mr. Hope N. Change surrounded himself (or vice versa) with kleptocrats. Frightening.
The Great Destroyer: Barack Obama’s War on the Republic Hardcover – June 4, 2012
by David Limbaugh (Author)
Written two years after the two books mentioned above, the author makes a strong case against the reelection of BHO. Journalism would prove no match for a bottomless tank of Kool-Aid.
This blog shares a common tone with these three works, one of innocence and naivete. Innocence and naivete are not terms that we usually associate with middle-aged writers, especially those authors as proficient as Malkin, Limbaugh, and Klein (hereafter referred to as MLK). Certainly not complimentary terms. But here they are.
In 2009, this blogger was also a middle-aged writer, minus the enormous accomplishments the above authors could lay claim to. “Post Obotomy Syndrome” was launched with the silly ass notion that if we could just highlight the vapidity of BHO–just showcase the hokey facade–his supporters would flee in vast numbers. This was before we knew about the Marxism, the kleptocracy, or the extensive weaponization of government on a scale never before witnessed in the US. This was before we laid witness to a prolonged economic non-recovery and disastrous foreign policy. If we could just shine a spotlight on the empty suit…
Naive. Innocent. Stupid. This writer was all of these things. MLK were never stupid but there is an air of childish credulity that permeates the narratives. If only I could tell the world. If only I could show the people. If only I could project the graph that so perfectly reflects our decline. MLK research the topics, burn up the keyboards, and ultimately hammer out the facts. Turns out, they have been transported to a post-factual world. Joke’s on them.
This blogger shared another silly viewpoint with a lot of other people, possibly a position that MLK entertained as well. While acknowledging the partisanship of MSM, many of us believed that a portion of the press corps would come to their senses about BHO. “Yes, we got caught up in “A Slobbering Love Affair” but prom night is over and we are going to report on that handsome Barry Soetoro with the same kid-glove fervor we used on Bill Clinton”. Wrong again. Post-factualism prevails.
Maybe someday an astute scholar will pinpoint the date when objective truth was sidelined from public discourse. MLK harken back to a time when facts mattered, and truth was still the ultimate trump card. Behold the innocence. The innocence lost.
Postscript: Apologies to Brenda J. Elliot, who is listed as a co-author with Aaron Klein. Many times I looked at the cover and only in today’s cut-and-paste exercise did I notice your name. Hold out for equal billing next time.
EDITOR’S NOTES
1. We do not link To Fox News or Fox Business News.
2. We sometimes link to Fox affiliates.
3. We sometimes link to sites that contain a video that might have a snippet from Fox News (usually Tucker Carlson).
4. We try to avoid second hand news stories that are sourced from Fox News or Fox Business News.
5. We try to not link to sites with pay walls. This eliminates NYT and WaPo (who cares?) but also eliminates WSJ and Epoch Times. We hope that Epoch Times changes their business model because they are one of the best news outlets in the English language.
6. We believe it is more important than ever for Americans to monitor world affairs. The most influential man in America is probably George Soros and he is not in America–nor is he an American. Other understated influences on America include World Economic Forum, BBC, and CBC, to name but a few.
7. Most English language newspapers in non-English speaking countries are paid subscription sites. This presents an ongoing challenge to report on world affairs.
8. We try to avoid linking to mainstream media when possible We are not hesitant to link to mainstream sources if the news story involves raw data, such as the daily stock market or weather statistics or sports scores. Even then, we usually provide a “Mainstream” disclaimer.
.